Skip Navigation


Public Opinion Quarterly Advance Access originally published online on July 29, 2009
Public Opinion Quarterly 2009 73(3):521-536; doi:10.1093/poq/nfp040
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
73/3/521    most recent
nfp040v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neijens, P.
Right arrow Articles by de Vreese, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Helping Citizens Decide in Referendums

The Moderating Effect of Political Sophistication on the Use of the Information and Choice Questionnaire as a Decision Aid

Peter Neijens and Claes de Vreese

Address correspondence to Peter Neijens; e-mail: p.c.neijens{at}uva.nl

Voters often lack sufficient knowledge to make educated decisions. We investigated how a decision aid-–the Information and Choice Questionnaire (ICQ)—helped them make more consistent decisions. The ICQ is designed for large-scale use and provides voters with information about a specific problem before asking them for their opinions. It provides citizens with information summarizing a full range of viable policy options and the probable consequences of each, as provided by experts. We investigated the ICQ in the context of the Dutch 2005 referendum on the European Constitutional Treaty. Respondents (N = 340) constituted a random sample of the Dutch population. We studied the effects of the ICQ on vote preferences and the consistency of voters’ preferences shortly before the referendum. We were especially interested in the moderating role of political sophistication on the uses and effects of the ICQ. Our study confirmed that many voters had little knowledge about the European Constitution and had inconsistent preferences. The ICQ made their vote preferences more consistent, especially for those participants with lower levels of political sophistication. This suggests that this decision aid can narrow the gap between the politically sophisticated and the politically less sophisticated.


PETER NEIJENS AND CLAES DE VREESE are with the Amsterdam School of Communications Research ASCoR, University of Amsterdam, Kloveniersburgwal 48, 1012 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Peter Neijens is Professor and Chair of Persuasive Communication and Claes de Vreese is Professor and Chair of Political Communication. We gratefully acknowledge support for this work by grant 400-04-001 from the Dutch National Science Foundation N W O awarded to the authors. We would like to thank the editor and three anonymous reviewers for their very useful comments. Thanks to Thomas Klausch (ASCoR) for his statistical advice.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.